How Research contribute to health and social care provision

Research have contributed to health and social care provision in different ways. This articles helps highlights you more on the Important of Research in the Health and Social care Provision

Research is a method of discovering better ways to prevent and treat diseases. According to (moule, P., and Hek, G.), research is a systematic approach to gathering information with the goal of answering questions and solving problems in order to create new knowledge about health and social care.

It is critical to conduct research to determine which treatments are most effective for patients. Research can provide answers to previously unknown questions, filling knowledge gaps and changing the way healthcare professionals work. Some of the most common goals for conducting research studies are as follows: Recognize diseases and health issues.

“Doctors and healthcare professionals know a lot about health, disease, and treatments, but some things are still unknown.” “Research can help find answers to unknown questions, fill knowledge gaps, and change the way doctors and healthcare professionals provide care.” Nihr.ac.uk (Nihr.ac.uk, 2017) The purpose and significance of research in health and social care are to establish patterns and statistics, to investigate disease patterns, to gather feedback from service users, to investigate theories, to extend understanding of theories, and to review and monitor changes in practice.

The Importance of Health Research

Health research, like privacy, is extremely valuable to society. It can provide valuable information about disease trends and risk factors, treatment outcomes or public health interventions, functional abilities, care patterns, and health care costs and utilization. The various research approaches provide complementary insights. Clinical trials can provide important information about the efficacy and side effects of medical interventions by controlling the variables that could influence the study’s results, but feedback from real-world clinical experience is also important for comparing and improving the use of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and diagnostics.

For example, FDA approval of a drug for a specific indication is based on a series of controlled clinical trials, often with a few hundred to a few thousand patients, but after approval, it may be used by millions of people in a variety of settings. As a result, tracking clinical experience with the drug is critical for identifying relatively rare adverse effects and determining effectiveness in different populations or under different conditions. It is also critical to document and evaluate clinical practice experience in order to develop best practices guidelines and ensure high-quality patient care.

The Public Values Health Research

According to a number of studies, the majorities of Americans have a positive attitude toward medical research and believe that it is beneficial to society. According to a recent Harris poll, nearly 80% of respondents were interested in health research findings, which are consistent with previous survey results (Westin, 2007). A 2005 study compiled data from 70 state surveys and 18 national surveys and discovered that the majority of Americans believe it is important to maintain world leadership in health-related research. Seventy-eight percent of those polled said it is very important, while 17 percent said it is somewhat important. Only 4% of Americans believe it is unimportant to maintain global leadership in health-related research.

A 2007 survey found similar results: 76 percent of respondents said science plays a very important role in our health, and 78 percent said science plays a very important role in our competitiveness.

According to the Virginia Commonwealth University 2004 Life Sciences Survey, most Americans have a positive attitude toward research. In this study, 90 percent of respondents agreed that advances in science have improved society; 92 percent agreed that “scientific research is essential for improving the quality of human lives”; and 84 percent agreed that “the benefits of scientific research outweigh the negative consequences” (NSF, 2006).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.